The Federal Government has broadened the Australian Renewable Energy Agency’s remit to support technologies to address carbon emissions, including carbon capture and storage, and last week released the agency’s new investment plan.
At the same time a new facility began operating using novel carbon capture technology designed to pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere to allow it to be injected underground and turned into a carbonate mineral.
The Orca direct air capture facility in Iceland, was developed by Swiss Group Climeworks, and uses a system of fans, filters and heaters in eight collectors the size of shipping containers to annually draw 4000 tonnes of CO₂ out of the air and trap it (see image below).
Heat piped into the boxes releases the CO₂ from the filters as a pure gas, after which it is combined with water and pumped deep underground where the gas, mixed with water, will slowly become stone as it cools.
Figure 1: Orca direct air capture facility
Climeworks entered agreements with Carbfix, a carbon storage start-up, and ON Power, the Icelandic geothermal energy provider, for the project. Iceland was selected because of its geothermal energy supplies and the right underground geology.
The underground storage of CO₂ at the Orca project is undertaken by Carbfix. Carbfix’s process involves “imitating and accelerating a natural process through which dissolved CO₂ and reactive rock formations interact to form thermodynamically stable carbonate minerals, thereby providing a permanent and environmentally benign carbon storage host”.
It began pilot injections in 2012 at the pilot site near ON Power’s Hellisheidi geothermal power plant in south-west Iceland. That earlier pilot showed that most of the CO₂ injected into basalt turned into carbonate minerals in less than two years. Basalt is very favourable for locking up carbon dioxide, according to Juerg Matter, a geochemist who has focused on carbon dioxide capture and storage via in situ mineral carbonation in basalt. For carbon dioxide to transform into carbonate, the rocks where the gas is injected need to have calcium, magnesium or iron-rich silicate minerals. With those, a chemical reaction occurs that converts the carbon dioxide and minerals into a chalky carbonate mineral[i].
The process of drawing carbon dioxide out of the air and pumping it underground demands a significant amount of electricity and heat – so the Orca plant was sited next to the Hellisheidi power plant, which has an installed capacity of 300 MW of electricity and up to 400 MW of thermal energy. The overall process at the Orca plant is shown below.
Figure 2: The Orca plant process
It is not the first plant developed by Climeworks – another direct air capture plant, considered the world’s first commercial facility, was built in Switzerland in 2017, but unlike the Icelandic project it uses the captured gas in greenhouses and sells it to carbonated beverage producers[ii]. That original plant can capture roughly 900 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year. The company has now developed 16 installations across Europe, but the Orca plant is the only one that permanently disposes of the CO₂ rather than recycling it.
Climeworks’ original goal was to capture 1 per cent of annual global CO₂ emissions - more than 300 million tonnes - by 2025, according to Bloomberg. It’s now targeting around 500,000 tonnes by the end of the decade.
As with much new and largely unproven at technology, it is expensive - roughly $800–1084 per tonne of carbon dioxide. Compare that to the current carbon price in Europe, which is approaching AUD$100 a tonne.
Climeworks aims to get the cost down to USD$200 to USD$300 a tonne by 2030, and to USD$100 to USD$200 by the middle of next decade, when it is targeting to have operations at full scale. Only at the lower rate would it become cheaper to use the system than pay a penalty.
In contrast capturing carbon from existing industrial processes with current technology, the cost can be as low as $40 a tonne. That’s because the concentration of CO₂ in those gases can be as high as 10 per cent, rather than 0.04 per cent in the air, according to BloombergNEF.
Apart from Climeworks there are other direct-air capture proponents including US-based Global Thermostat, which abandoned a venture with Exxon Mobil to develop a capable of capturing around 4000 tonnes each year, the same scale as the Orca plant - and Canada’s Carbon Engineering , which is working with Occidental Petroleum to build a plant that can capture around 1 million tonnes of CO₂ from the air annually.
In the race to deal with climate change a range of technologies and approaches are likely to be considered and trialled. Dramatic falls in the price of solar have shown how technological advancements can rapidly change our approach to achieving lower emissions, but many technologies that show early promise can also just as quickly fail to progress.
In the case of Orca it's 4000 tonnes a year of global carbon emissions sorted. Only more than 30,000,000,000 tonnes a year more to get to net zero.
[i] Smithsonian Magazine, June 2016
The Federal Cabinet recently met to consider the Government’s plan for a net zero emissions by 2050 target. This has proved challenging for the Coalition partners. The push for stronger interim targets has emerged in the lead up to the Glasgow Climate Summit and has been reinforced by other countries increasing their commitments. We look at some of the targets that have been set both domestically and internationally.
Debate about Australia’s national security needs and commitment to nuclear submarines has led to renewed advocacy for a domestic nuclear power industry. The question of nuclear power has previously been formally canvassed. While it's sensible to keep technology options open through a technology neutral approach, nuclear generation has major impediments to its introduction in Australia. We look at some of the challenges.
There’s been plenty of media attention around claims the average Australian household could save $5000 annually on their energy and vehicle costs by 2030 and up to $6000 by 2035 through greater electrification. But what is the basis for this claim? And what would have to happen for this to occur?
Send an email with your question or comment, and include your name and a short message and we'll get back to you shortly.