by Australian Energy Council
Discussion paper: The energy transition and implications for transmission
The latest discussion paper in our series on Australia’s Energy Future looks at the implications of an economy-wide 55 per cent reduction in emissions by 2035 target and the transition to net zero for Australia’s electricity transmission networks.
It sets out the basic regulatory framework that applies to transmission in Australia and some of the consequences that arise from that approach, such as the need to have robust regulatory approval processes on behalf of consumers, given they are underwriting the investment.
The paper then focuses on building the transmission required to connect the large-scale renewable generators needed to progress Australia’s transition to net-zero. That some new transmission is required is not in doubt. But the continued support of consumers for the energy transition is predicated on building the system as efficiently as possible. This raises questions about how to determine what gets built and where, how it is funded and who should bear the risks of overbuilding or building in the wrong location.
Click here to read the full report.
Related Analysis
Wild Cards: Could these technologies advance the energy transition?
In December 2022, scientists at the National Ignition Facility achieved a landmark nuclear fusion result: a reaction that produced more energy than the laser pulse used to start it. It made headlines globally, but the caveats came quickly. Overall system energy use was still far higher, and commercial viability remains decades away. It was a real breakthrough, but also a reminder of how far the engineering still has to go. That gap between scientific progress and commercial reality is a defining feature of the energy transition today. While solar, wind, and batteries are scaling rapidly and doing most of the heavy lifting, the International Energy Agency estimates that nearly half of the emissions reductions needed for net zero will depend on technologies still at demonstration stage or earlier. This raises the key question: which “wild card” technologies could help close that gap?We take a look.
Nuclear Fusion Deals – Based on reality or a dream?
Last week, Italian energy company ENI announced a $1 billion (USD) purchase of electricity from U.S.-based Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), described as the world’s leading commercial fusion energy company and backed by Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Ventures. CFS plans to start building its Arc facility in 2027–28, targeting electricity supply to the grid in the early 2030s. Earlier this year, Google also signed a commercial agreement with CFS. These are considered the world’s first commercial fusion-power deals. While they offer optimism for fusion as a clean, abundant energy source, they also recall decades of “breakthrough” announcements that have yet to deliver practical, grid-ready power. The key question remains: how close is fusion to being not only proven, but scalable and commercially viable, and which projects worldwide are shaping its future?
Community Power Network Trial: Potential risks and market impact
Australia leads the world in rooftop solar, yet renters, apartment dwellers and low-income households remain excluded from many of the benefits. Ausgrid’s proposed Community Power Network trial seeks to address this gap by installing and operating shared solar and batteries, with returns redistributed to local customers. While the model could broaden access, it also challenges the long-standing separation between monopoly networks and contestable markets, raising questions about precedent, competitive neutrality, cross-subsidies, and the potential for market distortion. We take a look at the trial’s design, its domestic and international precedents, associated risks and considerations, and the broader implications for the energy market.
Send an email with your question or comment, and include your name and a short message and we'll get back to you shortly.