Mar 02 2017

Interconnection: How does Australia and Europe compare?

The challenge of accommodating increasing amounts of renewable generation while maintaining supply security and ensuring affordability is not unique to Australia. More interconnectors are touted as an option in Australia despite the often long distances and relatively small demand centres, making it a costly proposition.

In contrast Europe, with its much shorter distances and high demand centres, is considering an array of potential interconnectors. In fact the European Commission has set targets for the amount of power produced that should be capable of being sent across jurisdictions. The goal is to create a single Europe-wide electricity market and ensure smooth incorporation of renewable energy. Last year alone there were 27 interconnector projects allocated grants in the EU. Less than a third of those were allocated for actual construction works, while the rest of the funding is to support studies into the feasibility of specific interconnectors.

Despite this work, the EU has expressed concern about the potential cost of interconnectors, which could reach as much €40 billion (AUD $60 billion) for a 10 per cent interconnection target by 2020. That target will require EU members to have enough electricity cables in place to allow at least 10 per cent of the electricity produced in a jurisdiction to be transported to neighbouring countries.

European Union Interconnection Target

The European Commission has set a target of 10 per cent electricity interconnection by 2020, which means that all EU countries should have transmission links in place that allow at least 10 per cent of the electricity produced in a jurisdiction to be transported across its borders to neighbouring countries[i]. According to the European Commission, 22 EU countries are on track to reach the target, or have already reached the target, but more interconnections will be required in other regions[ii]. Early last year the European Commission also set up an Expert Group to provide the Commission with technical advice on a proposed 15 per cent electricity interconnection target by 2030 into regional, country and/or border interconnection targets[iii].

Interconnectors can improve the cost-effectiveness of power grids although these can only be provided if the benefits offset the construction costs. Cost of interconnectors can be high with the Commission estimating that €40 billion will be needed to meet the 10 per cent interconnection target[iv]. This high price is mainly due to the technical constraints of laying cables across mountains and under seas.

The European Commission has drawn up a list of 195 key energy projects to better integrate the EU energy market and reach the EU’s energy policy objectives of affordable, secure and sustainable energy.  The financial support available to interconnector projects totals €5.35 billion from the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) with this funding designed to help fast track the projects and encourage private investors.

In 2016, there was a total of €707 million in grants allocated to 27 projects with eight of those grants going to construction works and 19 going into project studies. Figure 1 and 2 below show the proposed and completed projects since the CEF commenced in 2014.

Figure 1: European Proposed projects since 2014 under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)[v]

Source: European Commission

Figure 2: European completed projects since 2014 under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)[vi]

Source: European Commission

Denmark is an example of one country that has already met the European Commission’s requirements. Its interconnection capacity with its neighbors is equivalent to its full installed generation capacity. Its power links to Germany, Norway and Sweden allow the Danish energy system to manage the variability and uncertainty of a large wind power capacity. 

Spain is one of the countries that will need to increase its power links with neighbours. While Spain produces large amounts of solar and wind power it currently cannot provide surplus electricity to the rest of Europe because of its limited interconnection capacity. In 2015, an upgrade to the Iberian Peninsula’s DC interconnector with France doubled the existing electricity interconnection from 1400 MW to 2800 MW[vii]. The project represented a total investment of €700 million, receiving €255 million EU support under the European Energy Programme for Recovery. The underground connection between France and Spain took 14 years to complete, and cost seven times more than originally budgeted.

Germany is also likely to become more reliant on interconnectors as it continues its Energiewende policy that seeks to replace fossil fuel and nuclear generation with renewables. Germany needs to build 1,800 kilometers of new lines to meet the European target, and this is a goal that it is currently still some way from achieving[viii].

The UK currently has 3.4 GW of interconnector capacity under construction across three projects, while a total of six projects listed in the UK are well down the regulatory process. No proposed projects over 500km have recently been built due mainly to the cost and the time required for completion.

The proponents of the 720km NSN line from Norway to the UK, however, have signed contracts with key suppliers and the project appears to be preparing for cable construction. The other ambitious interconnectors, namely the 720km Viking Link between the UK and Denmark and the 1,000km IceLink interconnector proposed to link the UK and Iceland, are only at the concept stage with both expected to take over 10 years and cost over €3.5 billion. Below are all the proposed, completed and projects under construction for the UK. Not all of these will receive funding under the European Commission interconnector target programme.

Figure 3: EU to UK interconnectors – proposed, under construction and operational[ix]

Source: UtilityWise

Figure 4 shows interconnector projects that are supported in principle under the UK’s cap and floor regime.

Figure 4: Interconnectors supported in principle under the cap and floor regime in the UK[x]

How does this compare to Australia?

With Australia facing a similar transition to Europe’s energy sector to achieve deep cuts in its greenhouse gas emissions, the construction of additional interconnectors is being debated.

There are currently six interconnectors linking the five National Electricity Market (NEM) states. In contrast, Germany is connected to eight other energy markets. South Australia and Denmark have amongst the highest per capita wind generation capacity. South Australia is connected to Victoria by two transmission lines, which allow it to source a maximum of around 23 per cent of peak load from Victoria, while Denmark is able to source 100 per cent of its electricity from neighboring countries. 

Unless the benefits offset the large construction costs, the business case to develop new interconnectors could be challenging. Europe has proposed a number of large interconnectors although they also have one of the world’s densest populated power grids and in most cases the completed interconnectors have been smaller in length and MW size.

Progress on new NEM interconnectors has been slow over the past decade. Figure 5 (which was published in an earlier Energy Insider) illustrates the high cost associated with potential Australian interconnector projects. Current estimates for the cost of building a new interconnector range from $500 million to $1 billion for central South Australia to Victoria; from $500 million to $1.5 billion for mid-North SA to New South Wales; from $1.5 billion to $2 billion for northern SA to NSW; and $2 billion to $2.5 billion for northern SA to Queensland. Based on earlier projects and experience overseas, it is likely that the final cost to build these interconnectors would generally be much higher than forecast if they proceed.[xi].

Figure 5: Projected and Final costs for the construction of interconnectors[xii]

Source: AEMO, AEC analysis

AEMO, however, has identified potential benefits to electricity customers from development of additional interconnectors and estimated that six potential interconnector scenarios would have a positive Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR). AEMO’s preliminary assessment is that these interconnectors would lead to downward pressure on customer bills by allowing access to more efficient generation sources. Most interconnectors in Australia have been built under a Regulatory Investment Test. If the AER approves the business case, the full cost is recovered from consumers over the expected life of the asset. This means the proponents do not face the risk of the benefits turning out to be lower than the costs.

Figure 6: Market Benefit Analysis 2035-2036, neutral scenario, ($million)[xiii]

Source: AEMO

 


[i] European Commission, 2016, “Electricity interconnection targets”, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/infrastructure/electricity-interconnection-targets

[ii] ibid

[iii] European Commission, 2016, “New Expert Group on electricity interconnection targets: call for applications deadline extended”, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/news/new-expert-group-electricity-interconnection-targets-call-applications-deadline-extended

[iv] European Commission, 2015, “Connecting power markets to deliver security of supply, market integration and the large-scale uptake of renewables”, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-4486_en.htm

[v] http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/transparency_platform/map-viewer/main.html

[vi] http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/transparency_platform/map-viewer/main.html

[vii] European Commission, 2015, “Building the Energy Union: Key electricity interconnection between France and Spain completed”, <https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/news/building-energy-union-key-electricity-interconnection-between-france-and-spain-completed >

[viii] http://www.planete-energies.com/en/medias/close/electrical-interconnectors-european-commission-s-targets

[ix] https://www.utilitywise.com/2016/12/09/interconnectors/

[x] Norton Rose Fulbright, 2015, “New Interconnectors – Getting them built”, << http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/127381/new-interconnectors-getting-them-built >>

[xi] Adelaide Independent News, 2016, “New interconnector to cost up to $2.5 billion: ElectraNet”

[xii] Source: Australian Energy Market Operator, 2011, “South Australia – Victoria (Heywood) Interconnector Upgrade RIT-T: Project Specification Consultation Report October”, October 2011 and Australian Energy Market Operator, 2011, “ElectraNet-AEMO Joint Feasibility Study South Australian Interconnector Feasibility Study” and Australian Energy Market Operator, 2014, ‘The Heywood Interconnector: Overview of the upgrade and current status”, July 2014

[xiii] https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/Files/Electricity/NEM/Planning_and_Forecasting/NTNDP/2016/Dec/2016-NATIONAL-TRANSMISSION-NETWORK-DEVELOPMENT-PLAN.pdf

Related Analysis

Analysis

The best little blackout in Texas

They say everything’s bigger in Texas. The major power outages from which it is just emerging, were triggered by a polar vortex and impacted around 4.5 million customers. There's been plenty of finger pointing with intermittent renewables being blamed, questions raised about Texas’s go-it-alone attitude and claims of poor preparations stemming from a deregulated energy market.

Feb 25 2021
Analysis

New systems, new risks

The shift to an increasingly low-carbon grid will continue to bring major structural changes to electricity systems around the world and, with it, new challenges in managing security on various levels.

Nov 05 2020
Analysis

The wildcat strike: Twenty years on

We are often discussing the new challenges of securely operating a power system with new renewable and storage technologies. Twenty years ago the National Electricity Market supply was much more uniform relying on conventional large power systems, predominately coal. But that was no cruise either as the power system then faced a routine threat as big as anything we face today, but has now abated: industrial action.

Nov 05 2020
GET IN TOUCH
Do you have a question or comment for AEC?

Send an email with your question or comment, and include your name and a short message and we'll get back to you shortly.

Call Us
+61 (3) 9205 3100