May 28 2020

Setting the mark: Why price limits should change in WA

Alongside the lofty energy reforms being rolled out in Western Australia the annual review of the energy price limits has quietly captured the attention of market participants and industry watchers.

The energy price limit is a uniquely Western Australian characteristic where Short Term Energy Market (STEM) prices change each year but are capped. Whereas the National Electricity Market (NEM) has a current fixed spot price limit of $14,700/MWh, the Wholesale Electricity Market (WEM) has a maximum STEM price hovering between a high of $351/MWh in 2017/18 and a low of $235/MWh in 2019/20.

Such low price caps are standard for energy and capacity market designs like the WEM, where the value of capacity is rewarded via the separate capacity market. By contrast, energy-only markets like the NEM recover this value through the energy market, so they need a much higher cap in order to signal a need for additional reliability through occasional price spikes.

The latest review was noticeable for throwing up questions about the gas price modelling used, and requiring a re-calculation based on the shifting price outlook for distillate due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ultimately, the Australian Energy Market Operator’s (AEMO) just completed annual review of the energy price limits and the proposed prices will have significant consequences for participants in the WEM. We take a look below.

How does the energy price limit work?

Under clause 6.20.6 of the WEM Rules, AEMO must annually review the appropriateness of the Maximum STEM Price and the Alternative Maximum STEM Price. The Maximum STEM Price applies to facilities running on non-liquid fuel, such as gas, and the Alternative Maximum STEM Price relate to facilities using liquid fuel.

The Maximum STEM Price and Alternative Maximum STEM Price are based on the estimate of the short run marginal cost of the highest cost generating facility in the South West Interconnected System (SWIS) fuelled by natural gas and distillate respectively. To determine the short run marginal cost of highest cost generator, the following factors are taken into account: variable operating and maintenance costs, the heat rate, fuel cost, the loss factor at its connection location, and a risk margin.

AEMO typically engages an independent consultant – this year they appointed Marsden Jacob Associates – to review the upper price limits and the report is then sent to the WA Economic Regulation Authority (ERA) for review and approval.

Determining the price limits

The first step in conducting the 2020/21 review is selecting the generators to be the basis for the upper energy price limits.

The WEM Rules note that the generators used to set the Maximum STEM Price and Alternative Maximum STEM Price must be 40MW open cycle gas turbine units. So, based on this requirement, the generator units selected were the 6 x Pinjar 40 MW gas turbine units located on the outskirts of Perth and the aero-derivative units at the Parkeston Power Station, which is in the Goldfields Region. These were the same generator units used in the 2019-20 review.

After obtaining data for the Pinjar and Parkeston units, Marsden Jacob Associates undertook simulations to develop the distributions of the variable costs, including:

  • Variable O&M – this depends on variable operating labour costs, usage-related maintenance costs (i.e. labour and materials) and non-fuel inputs such as lubricants and water. A key determinant is the number and costs of generator unit starts and how this impacts maintenance costs.
  • Heat rate – the modelling had start-up heat energy between 9 to 15 GJ/start for each turbine. Start-up energy consumption was aggregated across all generation for that start.
  • Loss factors – this was based on the 2019-20 year. For Pinjar it was 1.0369 and at Parkeston it was 1.1633.
  • Gas prices – this required both gas commodity costs and gas transport costs to be determined.
  • Distillate prices – reflected movements in crude oil prices.

With the distributions determined, Marsden Jacob Associates performed a Monte Carlo simulation which involved sampling at random from input probability distributions of the variable O&M, fuel cost and heat rate. Marsden Jacob Associates undertook 10,000 iterations of the model to generate the probability distribution of possible Maximum STEM Price outcomes. The risk margin was determined as the difference between the mean and the 80th percentile.

The results for 2020/21

The exhaustive desktop simulation eventually produced the Maximum STEM Price and Alternative Maximum STEM Price at Pinjar and Parkeston.


Source: AEMO,  2020-21 Energy Price Limits Review - Draft Report

Pinjar had the highest maximum and alternative maximum prices so those units were used to determine the energy price limits.

The Maximum STEM Price increased by $9.79/MWh in 2020/21 largely due to higher O&M costs and risk margin.

Source: AEMO,  2020-21 Energy Price Limits Review - Draft Report

Similarly, the Alternative Maximum STEM Price jumped by $9.33/MWh again due to increased O&M costs and risk margin.

Source: AEMO,  2020-21 Energy Price Limits Review - Draft Report

These upper energy price limits compared favourably to the prices since 2012.

Figure 1: Comparison of assessed and historical upper energy price limits

 Source: page 9, ERA 2019 Energy Price Limits Decision

But just as everyone started to digest this information, AEMO announced that Marsden Jacob Associates would re-calculate the energy price limits to account for the impacts of COVID-19. In particular, they claimed that the distillate price outlook substantially reduced between the release of the first draft report in March and their decision to revise the report in early May 2020. The gas price, however, would remain unchanged from the first draft report which had already incorporated a low gas price outlook reflecting their view that LNG is oversupplied.

The review of the draft report saw the liquid fuel price drop a staggering $201.69/MWh resulting in the Alternative Maximum STEM Price collapsing to $379.69/MWh.

Figure 2: Change in the Alternative Maximum STEM Price from 2019-20


Source: AEMO,  2020-21 Energy Price Limits Review - Draft Report

Modelling the wrong scenario

Despite the substantial drop in the Alternative Maximum STEM price, it’s debatable whether the methodology for calculating both the gas price was correct in the first place.

To determine the gas price, Marsden Jacobs Associates used the average of the past year maximum gas prices to provide an estimate of the expected value for the coming year. This put the mean gas price just below $3/GJ.

Figure 3: Projection of maximum gas prices 2020-21


Source: AEMO,  2020-21 Energy Price Limits Review - Draft Report

This approach to calculating the gas fuel prices assumes that generators in the WEM can easily buy fuel on the spot market. As the report notes:

It should also be pointed out that most gas is traded informally between the major gas buyers and sellers in Western Australia. There is a high concentration of both major buyers and sellers which implies that each party can simply enter into bilateral spot transactions on a daily, weekly or monthly basis[i].

In reality, of course, generators have fixed gas supply agreements at much higher historic prices. And, irrespective of that, AEMO is nudging generators towards having fixed supply agreements with its own draft Market Procedure: Certification of Reserve Capacity where it states that “AEMO considers that a fuel supply or fuel transportation (including gas pipeline capacity) quantity of less than 90% firm may (depending on the volume) indicate a restriction on fuel availability that could prevent the Facility operating at its full capacity”, potentially lowering the facility’s capacity and reducing its capacity payments[ii].

If the modelling was to reflect the gas prices actually paid by generators, then the Maximum STEM Price would be noticeably higher and more indicative of actual costs.


The annual review of the energy price limits in the WEM tends to fly under the radar. But the value of the upper price limits has an enormous impact on generators and their ability to recover operating costs. This is particularly important at a time when some participants are also getting squeezed on the retail side following the devastating impact of COVID-19 on the Australian economy.

What’s especially noteworthy about the energy price limits review is the disconnect between the gas price assumption used in the modelling and the reality faced by generators. Interestingly, the ERA advised on 18 May 2020 that its review of the methods used to calculate the energy price limits has been suspended given the overlap of work being undertaken through the Energy Transformation Strategy and following correspondence from the Minister for Energy[iii] This may be an unfortunate turn of events given the impact that compressed upper price limits will have on market participants in the WEM.

Capacity and energy market arrangements like the WEM require many economic parameters that must be frequently reset by a regulator, such as the STEM caps. These resets are necessarily always controversial, with each decision having major impacts on investors and consumers. It is a fraught task for a regulator to estimate any parameters that attempt to ascribe a single value to an input (in this case gas price), when the real market has a great many ways of obtaining its inputs.





Related Analysis


Offshore wind feasibility licenses have been granted – what are the proposals and who’s behind them?

The Federal Government has announced the first proposed offshore wind projects to receive a feasibility licence for development of generation in the Gippsland Offshore Wind Zone. We take a look at the proponents and projects.

May 02 2024

Gas outlook highlights peaking plant role in transition

Apart from raising some alarm bells over future potential gas shortfalls, the release of the Australian Energy Market Operator’s assessment of gas needs again highlighted the important role gas generation will play in the energy transition.  Gas generation is seen increasingly as a “strategic reserve for power system reliability and security” and “will be critical when it runs”. We take a look. 

Apr 04 2024

The Wholesale Demand Response Mechanism: Leading a horse to water

After being first recommended in 2011 by the AEMC's Power of Choice Review, and followed by a decade-long passionate debate, the Wholesale Demand Response Mechanism was finally implemented on 24 October 2021. Two years later we look back and see if it was worth all the effort.

Sep 07 2023
Do you have a question or comment for AEC?

Send an email with your question or comment, and include your name and a short message and we'll get back to you shortly.

Call Us
+61 (3) 9205 3100